The people who want tail emissions (i.e. continual inflation) don't seem to recognise that would impact people's desire to store value in the coin.

The 'continual security budget' might actually decline in real terms if the coin value goes down over time.

Follow

@stephanlivera Just to steelman a bit: If tail emissions were necessary for Bitcoins survival then NOT having them would also affect peoples willingness to save in a doomed currency

Sign in to participate in the conversation
LinuxRocks.Online

Linux geeks doing what Linux geeks do...